The Facts

Maria, Robert, and Elena are three adult siblings whose mother passed away in Pasadena, California. Their mother had owned the family home since 1979. She held the property in a revocable living trust that became irrevocable upon her death.

The trust divides the estate equally among the three children. There is no mortgage on the home. The property details at the time of transfer are as follows:

Elena, the youngest, has lived nearby her entire adult life. She wants to keep the home. Maria and Robert live out of state and would prefer to receive their cash share and move on.

The Math on Day One

Each sibling's one-third share of the $1,150,000 property is approximately $383,333. To buy out Maria and Robert, Elena needs to pay each of them $383,333, for a total of $766,666.

Elena does not have $766,666 in cash. She has stable income, good credit, and a clear intention to move into the home. She contacts North Coast Financial to discuss a trust loan secured by the Pasadena property.

Loan terms quoted: $770,000 loan amount (rounded to cover the buyout plus closing costs), 10.5% rate, 1.5 points origination. This is structured as a 12-month bridge loan while Elena completes the transfer into her name and qualifies for a conventional refinance.

Elena pays Maria and Robert their shares. She moves into the home within the required 12 months and files the BOE-19-P with the Los Angeles County Assessor.

The Prop 19 Exclusion Calculation

The market value ($1,150,000) minus the assessed value ($280,000) is $870,000. Since $870,000 is less than the $1 million cap, Elena qualifies for a complete exclusion with no addition to the assessed value. Her property taxes are based on $280,000, not $1,150,000.

Annual property tax on $280,000 (at 1.2%): $3,360. Annual property tax if reassessed to $1,150,000: $13,800. Annual savings: $10,440 per year.

The 20-Year Property Tax Projection

Property taxes under Prop 13 increase by no more than 2% per year. The table below compares Elena's annual tax obligation under the exclusion versus full reassessment over 20 years, using the 2% annual increase on both scenarios.

YearTax With Exclusion (2% increase)Tax Without Exclusion (2% increase)Annual Savings
1$3,360$13,800$10,440
5$3,633$14,921$11,288
10$4,012$16,488$12,476
20$4,893$20,112$15,219

Cumulative tax savings over 20 years: approximately $253,000. This is the real dollar value of preserving the Prop 19 exclusion in this scenario.

The Net Position

Elena spent approximately $92,400 in loan costs to preserve an exclusion worth roughly $253,000 over 20 years. The net benefit is approximately $160,000, and that does not account for property appreciation or the emotional value of keeping the family home.

The Equalization Loan Structure

The trust loan closed in 9 business days from the time Elena submitted a complete application package. The title company coordinated with the successor trustee to record the deed of trust against the property. Loan proceeds were wired to an escrow account, and the escrow disbursed $383,333 each to Maria and Robert simultaneously.

Elena moved into the home within 30 days of the trust loan closing. She began the conventional refinance application with her bank at the same time. Eight months later, she refinanced the trust loan into a 30-year conventional mortgage at a rate that reduced her total monthly carrying costs. The trust loan was paid off in full, with no prepayment penalty.

How Filing the BOE-19-P Locked It In

Elena's probate attorney filed the BOE-19-P with the Los Angeles County Assessor within 60 days of moving in. The claim was processed, the assessor confirmed the exclusion, and the property's assessed value remained at $280,000. No reassessment notice was ever issued. Elena's property tax bill for the year read exactly what her mother had been paying, plus the standard 2% Prop 13 increase.

The timing mattered. Filing promptly, before the assessor could initiate a reassessment review, made the process smooth. Families who wait too long may receive a reassessment notice and then have to file the claim as a retroactive correction, which adds complexity and delays.

Lessons From This Scenario

Frequently Asked Questions

What if the market value had been $1,400,000 instead of $1,150,000?
The gap between assessed value ($280,000) and market value ($1,400,000) would be $1,120,000. Subtracting the $1 million cap leaves $120,000 added to the assessed value, giving a new assessed value of $400,000. Annual tax would be approximately $4,800, still far below the $16,800 full reassessment amount. The exclusion is still enormously valuable even when the $1 million cap applies.
Can Elena rent out a room in the home after moving in?
The rules around partial rentals and Prop 19 exclusions are still developing. Consult a California property tax attorney before renting out any portion of the inherited home to understand how it may affect the exclusion.

Similar Situation? Call Us.

North Coast Financial funds Prop 19 equalization loans throughout California. Call 760-722-2991 to discuss your specific property and timeline.